Strength of Plot -- Graded "A"
Strength of Plot -- Graded "B"
Strength of Plot -- Graded "C"
Character Development -- Graded "A"
Character Development -- Graded "B"
Character Development -- Graded "C"
Quality of the Story's Ending -- Graded "A"
Quality of the Story's Ending -- Graded "B"
Quality of the Story's Ending -- Graded "C"
Never Read
Grading: The Gunslinger
The Gunslinger
Donald M. Grant, 1982
Round 2, Group V
Strength of Plot:
2.567307692 (Graded B+)
Character Development:
2.519230769 (Graded B+)
Quality of Ending:
2.548076923 (Graded B+)
Overall Average Grade:
2.544871794 (Graded B+)
Combined Round 1 & 2 scores:
6.731312472
Heng Dai
ABC on this one. I liked the story, but if it hadn't been for TDotT I probably would have quit right there. I hated the whole blade of grass ending, but otherwise I thought it was an okay book.
"People, especially children, aren't measured by their IQ. What's important about them is whether they're good or bad, and these children are bad." ~ Alan Bernard
"You needn't die happy when your day comes, but you must die satisfied, for you have lived your life from beginning to end and ka is always served." ~ Roland Deschain
Actually I thought the Plot was the weakest part of this book. I give it a B and gave the rest of the book two A's. I agree with Dags, if it hadn't been for TDotT I wouldn't have read any more. ACTUALLY, if it hadn't been for my brother's urging I wouldn't have read anymore. I was not impressed with The Gunslinger and am beginning to think I should have given the plot a "C".
Margaret Emmie Mackey Catoe, you are, have been, and always will be my soulmate, and I love you.
Con todo mi corazon, por todo de mis dias. And I always will, in this life and into the next.
August 2, 1947 - September 24, 2010
B, C, B
Ask not what bears can do for you, but what you can do for bears. (razz)
When one is in agreement with bears one is always correct. (mae)
bears are back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AAA
Roland would have understood.
All A's. I know its fragmented at parts, but it works within the aesthetic of the book itself. I don't know, it was magical to me and the one I've re-read the most.
B,A,A
I think the plot could have used a little tightening up. Other than that, I loved this book from the first time I read it.
What the bear said.Originally Posted by Jean
Ask not what bears can do for you, but what you can do for bears. (razz)
When one is in agreement with bears one is always correct. (mae)
bears are back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BCA here.
BBA
the first (and even the second) time i read this, quite a bit of the time i had no fucking clue what was happening.
King didn't really get into Roland until after the first book; at least i think so.
and I liked the ending. (which to me begins just before they run into Walter and Roland lets Jake Drop)
Come to think of it, I never got a stronger sense of Roland's world than in this novel. I often wish the other books were more in line with this one. All of King's major themes seem to be the most present in The Gunslinger, which is often the case with a young writer. It was overly ambitious and I couldn't love it more.
Precisely. Not until Wizard & Glass did I feel anything like that again. The people of River Crossing in The Waste Lands were a tiny hint of what things were like in Roland's world, but not until we actually went back to Roland's world did I experience anything like the sense of it I got from The Gunslinger. I know much of that had to to do with the plot going forward and the book taking place in other worlds, but everything we learn about Roland's world before it moved on adds depth to his character.
AAA from me
I am the one I am the one
The godlike terror train
The superior, artificial brain
Feel free to call me Blaine!
and me,this is the apotheoses of the story for me. wait where am I?
The answer is within
all matter is energy, all energy is GOD
I like the book. My grades don't seem to reflect my overall opinion of the book. It's just that we give points in these three categories. The plot of the book is not very strong and it is pretty much summed up in the first sentence. It makes more sense in the greater scope of the saga that is The Dark Tower, but we grade the book individually, right? The characters don't develop in the first book yet and the ending is a bit confusing. This book shines more as you read the rest of the books, but itself it's not very strong and it probably wouldn't be in my second round. Sorry for the rant.
Well said, Django. I'll also echo others' sentiments that were it not for DT2, I would have trouble with the series. Not that I would never read the other books; it's just that DT2 was vastly superior in every way to DT1.
Straight A's from me, I was hooked from the beginning.
You make some good points, but I have to disagree. I think King shines in all the above categories when it comes to short stories and/or novellas which is how the Gunslinger was originally parsed. When the space is constrained, King's plots tend to flow a lot better with a clear point A and B. I felt this was the case with each chapter, and the development of Roland was very strong for me- I loved each flashback and I believed him when he said he loved Jake. As far as the ending, confusing, but intriguing and fitting considering the nature of the tower. Stylistically, I think the dream and its fragmented presentation was the perfect way to present something that is ineffable in its essence.
Strong plot in each story- beginning, middle and end.
Its entitled the Gunslinger, and Roland's development was excellent in my opinion.
The ending was just as dark, mysterious, and fragmented as Roland's grail and thus fitting and perfect within the aesthetic of the novel itself- which is an A worthy achievement for me.
Did the story really END? seems it was only a conclusion of a chapter until the next 6 came along
A+A+ ??
If it weren't for integrity...what would you be? Ka is a wheel.....
A+,A+,A+ I've lost count how many times i've read it.
Exactly.
"...that Siren which called and sang and promised so much and gave, after all, so little." ~ Ray Bradbury
I wasn't very impressed with this book, but I was forwarned, even King mentioned himself that he wrote the books overa long span of time. I actually read a book inbetween this one and the Drawing of the Three. I graded it BCB, (I think I've graded everything the same as Jean in the Tower series so far!) I thought it was slow when I read it until the ending...the hawk was interesting, and jake. But I didn't feel like I got to know Roland or Jake as well as I could have in the first book. I should re-read it sometime, I was worried that I didn't read them back to back when I did (Gunslinger and The Drawing of the Three, but I read all of the others in unison after that).
A, A, A.
This had been my favorite DT book, till the time I re-read WatG.
Straight A's from me. This book (original) hooked me and I was a junkie for 26 or so years. Not many books...or many things, capture my attention for such a period of time. I graded the original while keeping the revised in mind too.
All that's left of what we were is what we have become.
Posting Permissions
